A 54-year-old client with a 6-week-old tibial stress fracture (non-weight-bearing status) requires upper-body and core strength assessment. Which test battery is MOST appropriate?
Why each option is right or wrong
Pick an answer. Then tap any option to read its explanation, the wrong ones included.
A — Not this one. Push-ups and inverted rows load the lower legs through the feet, and hanging work means getting on and off a bar, all at odds with non-weight-bearing status.
B — Not this one. Most of this battery is seated, but the standing Pallof press puts weight through the injured leg.
C — Correct. Seated machine 10-RM tests isolate pushing and pulling, and a supine curl-up checks the trunk while the injured leg rests straight and unloaded, so nothing passes through the healing tibia. A multiple-RM test is the usual substitute when a true 1-RM is not appropriate.
D — Not this one. Deferring everything wastes the recovery window; seated tests that respect the restriction can set baselines now.
E — Not this one. Standing presses, single-leg hinges and loaded carries all require full weight-bearing, which the client does not have.